Contents
Key Takeaways
Skills assessment tools are becoming mission-critical in tech hiring, helping companies evaluate real ability instead of relying on resumes or inflated credentials.
The most effective tools use simulation-based assessments, replicating real engineering work to predict job performance with far higher accuracy than quizzes or whiteboarding.
Modern platforms offer automation, AI evaluation, ATS integration, and detailed analytics, allowing teams to scale hiring without sacrificing quality.
Tools vary by depth—some specialize in technical coding, others in cognitive or behavioral assessment, giving CTOs flexibility based on their hiring needs.
Adopting a skills-first workflow reduces mis-hires, shortens time-to-hire, and expands access to diverse, high-performing engineering talent.
Introduction
You're drowning in resumes, but your interview loop remains a revolving door of mismatched engineering candidates. The problem isn't your sourcing strategy; it’s a broken screening process that relies on keyword-matching and abstract algorithm quizzes.
These outdated methods fail to reveal the one thing that truly matters: can the candidate actually do the job? They tell you what a candidate knows, not how they apply that knowledge to solve real-world problems.
This guide cuts through the noise. We're going beyond marketing claims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the top skills assessment tools designed for technical hiring. We'll show you which platforms let you see true on-the-job capability versus just theoretical knowledge.
Forget generic feature lists; we provide an honest breakdown of each tool's strengths, weaknesses, and ideal use cases. You'll get detailed insights into their real-job simulation capabilities, scoring rubrics, pricing, and key integrations.
Each review includes direct links and screenshots to give you a clear view of the platform. We'll help you find the right tool to stop guessing and start seeing genuine engineering talent.
Beyond traditional assessment platforms, innovative approaches like exploring how AI simulation for closing skills gaps can offer deeper insights into a candidate's practical abilities. Let's fix your technical hiring funnel for good.
Quick Glance: Here are the Top 9 Skills Assessment Tools Which are Top-Rated Across the Globe
Utkrusht.ai: Best for evidence-based hiring through realistic, video-recorded job simulations that show how candidates work, not just what they know.
TestGorilla: Offers a range of pre-employment tests, including cognitive ability, personality, and skills assessments, useful for businesses of all sizes aiming for a comprehensive evaluation process.
iMocha: Specializes in skills assessments across various domains, providing detailed insights into candidates' technical abilities, making it suitable for businesses focusing on technical roles
HackerRank: This platform is designed for evaluating coding skills through various challenges and assessments, ideal for tech companies prioritizing programming expertise.
Utkrusht: Focuses on assessing technical and cognitive skills, offering a variety of tests that cater to the needs of technology-driven organizations.
Codility: Provides coding tests and challenges to assess developers' skills, beneficial for organizations looking to hire proficient programmers.
DevSkiller: Offers programming tests and assessments based on real-world scenarios, helping companies find candidates with practical coding skills.
CodinGame: Combines coding challenges and assessments in a game-like environment, appealing to candidates and companies looking for an engaging recruitment process.
CodeSignal: Delivers coding assessments and certifications, assisting companies in identifying top technical talent efficiently.
. HackerEarth: A platform for technical recruitment offering coding challenges and hackathons to evaluate candidates' programming skills.
. Vervoe: Uses machine learning to assess candidates through customizable skills tests, catering to businesses seeking a personalized recruitment approach.
. LeetCode: Known for its coding problems and contests, it serves companies searching for candidates with strong problem-solving abilities.
. Coderbyte: Provides coding challenges and assessments for evaluating technical skills, suitable for organizations seeking to hire developers.
. CoderPad: An interview platform that allows live coding sessions, enabling companies to assess candidates' coding capabilities in real-time.
. TestDome: Offers various skills tests, including programming, accounting, and language assessments, useful for companies needing a broad overview of candidates' abilities.
Still screening candidates based on resumes and theory?
Switch to Utkrusht and evaluate real skills through job simulations that mirror the work your engineers do every day. Get started today and hire with confidence.
What is a Skills Assessment?
A skills assessment is a structured evaluation used by companies to measure a job candidate's specific abilities and competencies required for a role. Instead of relying only on a resume, it provides objective data on whether a person can actually perform the job's tasks.
This can include anything from technical coding tests to problem-solving exercises. The goal is to get a clear, unbiased picture of a candidate's true capabilities.
What is a Skills Assessment Tool?
A skills assessment tool is a software platform that automates the process of creating, distributing, and evaluating these assessments. These tools provide pre-built test libraries, environments for hands-on tasks, and analytics to help hiring managers make data-driven decisions.
They streamline the screening process, reduce bias, and help identify top talent more efficiently by focusing on tangible skills rather than just credentials.
1. Utkrusht.ai
Utkrusht.ai directly confronts the gap between what a candidate claims and what they can actually do. Instead of proxy measures like quizzes, it centers its entire methodology on realistic job simulations.
It provides an environment where candidates demonstrate their skills by tackling tasks they would encounter in their first few weeks on the job, like fixing a bug on an EC2 server or optimizing a slow SQL query.
This "proof-of-work" approach gives hiring managers a crucial, evidence-based window into a candidate’s true capabilities. You are not just getting a score; you are getting a video-recorded work sample of a candidate debugging, refactoring, and making tradeoffs using the same tools they would use on your team.
This focus on tangible evidence positions Utkrusht.Ai as a powerful and practical choice for engineering leaders who value performance over pedigree.
Main 3 Features
Realistic Job Simulations: Candidates work in a pre-configured environment to solve real-world problems, replicating an actual work day.
Video-Recorded Work Samples: Every session is recorded, providing indisputable proof of how a candidate approaches problems and uses tools.
AI-Powered Shortlisting: The platform delivers a ranked shortlist of the top 10 candidates with work samples and analysis, saving engineering time.
Unique Differentiation aka Core USP
The primary differentiator is its commitment to proof-of-work over proxies. You watch a candidate fix a real bug instead of asking them how they might do it.
This direct, observable evidence of on-the-job competence provides a much higher-fidelity signal of a candidate’s potential performance compared to generic quizzes. You can see a detailed breakdown of how Utkrusht.Ai's proof-of-work model stands apart.
Use This If You Prefer X
Use this if you prefer to see how candidates perform real-world tasks, not just read their resumes. It's ideal for small engineering teams (typically under 1000 employees) who want to replace time-consuming screening with high-quality, verified shortlists delivered in days.
Do Not Use This If You Prefer Y
Do not use this if you prefer standardized algorithm tests or large-scale, automated MCQ screening as your primary filter.
1 Standout Feature
The video-recorded work samples provide an undeniable look into a candidate's problem-solving process and technical fluency.
Pricing
Utkrusht.Ai is positioned as the most budget-friendly option compared to other simulation-based platforms. Pricing is customized, and you must schedule a demo for a quote.
Does it evaluate candidates by watching how they work in real-life situations?
Yes, this is its core function. It assesses candidates by observing them as they solve job-relevant tasks in a simulated work environment.
Best For
Small to mid-sized engineering teams seeking high-quality hires with verified, on-the-job skills.
Main Downside
The lack of public pricing requires a sales call, which can be a hurdle for teams preferring a self-service model.
Does it show proof-of-work samples?
Yes. It provides video recordings and work artifacts for every candidate as direct proof of their skills.
Does it have advanced proctoring or cheating mechanisms?
Yes. It includes built-in cheat detection and monitors candidate sessions to ensure integrity.
Does it offer a free trial?
Yes, the company offers trial roles and demos to new users upon request.
2. SHL
SHL is a global leader in talent assessment, leveraging decades of industrial-organizational psychology. Its platform offers a vast, scientifically validated library of tests covering cognitive abilities, personality, and job-specific skills. For engineering leaders, this means access to assessments that go beyond coding to evaluate problem-solving, learning agility, and cultural fit.
Unlike niche coding platforms, SHL’s strength lies in its breadth and enterprise-readiness. Its model caters to large organizations needing a scalable, compliant, and integrated solution for diverse hiring needs across the entire company. While powerful, the sheer volume of options can be overwhelming, often requiring a dedicated onboarding period.
Main 3 Features
An extensive library of behavioral, cognitive, and skill-based assessments.
Virtual assessment centers that simulate a "day in the life."
Self-service online catalog for browsing and purchasing tests.
Unique Differentiation aka Core USP
Deep scientific validation from over 45 years in psychometric testing provides a level of research-backed credibility that many newer tools lack.
Use This If You Prefer X
Use this if you prefer a scientifically validated, all-in-one platform to assess a wide range of roles and prioritize compliance and scalability for a large enterprise.
Do Not Use This If You Prefer Y
Do not use this if you prefer a simple, engineering-first platform focused purely on real-world coding simulations.
1 Standout Feature
Its virtual assessment centers simulate various job-related exercises to evaluate candidates in a holistic, job-relevant context.
Pricing
Pricing is not public. It requires account registration to view and offers both subscription and pay-per-assessment models.
Does it evaluate candidates by watching how they work in real-life situations?
Yes, through its job simulations and virtual assessment centers, though these are typically more focused on business scenarios than hands-on coding.
Best For
Global enterprises and large organizations requiring a validated, compliant, and comprehensive assessment tool for all departments.
Main Downside
The platform's complexity and vast portfolio can be overwhelming for small teams, and the lack of transparent pricing is a barrier.
Does it show proof-of-work samples?
Yes, detailed reports and outputs from simulations serve as evidence of a candidate's abilities.
Does it have advanced proctoring or cheating mechanisms?
Yes, it offers various proctoring solutions to ensure assessment integrity.
Does it offer a free trial?
No, it typically offers demos and guided trials for prospective enterprise clients.
3. Criteria (formerly Criteria Corp)
Criteria offers a broad suite of pre-employment tests including cognitive aptitude, personality, and emotional intelligence. This platform aims to provide a holistic candidate profile, helping leaders understand not just what a candidate can do, but how they think and fit into a team. It consolidates multiple assessment types into a single platform.
The platform operates on an annual subscription model with uncapped usage, making it a predictable option for companies with consistent hiring needs. This all-in-one approach is designed to streamline hiring by combining skills testing with structured video interviews. The platform is less focused on deep technical simulations and more on providing standardized tests for various roles.
Main 3 Features
A comprehensive test suite including cognitive, personality, and skills assessments.
Structured video and live interviewing add-ons.
Standard applicant tracking system (ATS) integrations.
Unique Differentiation aka Core USP
It combines a wide variety of psychometric and skills tests with an integrated video interviewing solution under a predictable, uncapped subscription model.
Use This If You Prefer X
Use this if you prefer a consolidated platform that combines traditional skills assessments with personality tests and video interviewing, with predictable annual costs.
Do Not Use This If You Prefer Y
Do not use this if you prefer a specialized tool for assessing deep engineering skills through interactive coding environments.
1 Standout Feature
Its straightforward subscription tiers offer uncapped test usage, providing a clear budget for high-volume recruiters.
Pricing
Pricing is not public and is provided through a custom quote based on company size and needs.
Does it evaluate candidates by watching how they work in real-life situations?
No, it focuses primarily on standardized skills tests and personality assessments rather than interactive, real-world job simulations.
Best For
Mid-sized to large companies that need a versatile assessment tool for various roles and value an integrated interviewing platform.
Main Downside
The lack of public pricing creates an initial hurdle, and its assessments are more generalized than tailored for complex engineering scenarios.
Does it show proof-of-work samples?
No, the output is a test score or report on traits, not a tangible work sample from a simulated task.
Does it have advanced proctoring or cheating mechanisms?
Yes, it offers features to maintain test integrity.
Does it offer a free trial?
No, it offers product demos and may provide limited trials upon request.
Website: https://www.criteriacorp.com/
4. Wonderlic (Wonderlic Select and Develop)
Wonderlic is well-known for its cognitive ability tests. Its modern platform, Wonderlic Select, broadens this scope by offering multi-measure assessments that combine cognitive ability with personality and motivation. This approach provides a holistic view of a candidate, aiming to predict job performance beyond just technical aptitude.
The platform is designed for ease of use, generating manager-friendly reports that don't require specialized certification to interpret. This focus on clear guidance helps managers make quicker, more informed decisions. The lack of transparent pricing for its main packages means teams cannot easily evaluate costs without engaging with a sales representative.
Main 3 Features
Multi-measure assessments covering cognitive skills, personality, and motivation.
Job-specific benchmarks to compare candidates.
Manager-friendly reports for easy interpretation.
Unique Differentiation aka Core USP
Strong brand recognition in cognitive ability testing combined with a modern, integrated approach to measuring motivation and personality.
Use This If You Prefer X
Use this if you prefer a trusted tool that provides a balanced scorecard of a candidate's cognitive abilities and personality traits, with easy-to-digest reports.
Do Not Use This If You Prefer Y
Do not use this if you prefer a hands-on, engineering-focused platform for evaluating practical coding skills.
1 Standout Feature
Its combination of three scientifically-validated measures (cognitive ability, motivation, personality) into a single, cohesive candidate profile.
Pricing
Pricing is not public for Select and Develop packages and is quote-based.
Does it evaluate candidates by watching how they work in real-life situations?
No, it focuses on psychometric and cognitive assessments rather than immersive job simulations.
Best For
Organizations that want to screen candidates for cognitive potential and personality fit across a wide variety of roles.
Main Downside
The absence of public pricing is a barrier, and its assessments are more predictive of potential than demonstrative of hands-on technical skills.
Does it show proof-of-work samples?
No, it generates predictive reports and scores, not tangible work artifacts.
Does it have advanced proctoring or cheating mechanisms?
Yes, it offers proctoring options to maintain the integrity of its cognitive ability tests.
Does it offer a free trial?
No, it typically offers demos and guided trials upon request.
Website: https://wonderlic.com/
5. TestGorilla
TestGorilla is a go-to platform for small and mid-market companies seeking a fast, user-friendly approach to skills-based hiring. It offers a massive library of over 350 pre-built tests spanning cognitive ability, personality, and programming skills. This breadth allows managers to create well-rounded assessments that evaluate technical prowess alongside culture add and soft skills.
The platform’s major appeal is its straightforward, self-service model and public pricing. Unlike enterprise systems, a team can sign up and start sending assessments in minutes. The credit-based system is easy to understand, making it accessible for teams that need to get running quickly without a significant upfront commitment.
Main 3 Features
An extensive library of over 350 pre-employment tests.
Custom question and coding challenge capabilities.
Optional one-way video interviews and AI-powered scoring.
Unique Differentiation aka Core USP
Its vast, multi-disciplinary test library combined with a transparent, credit-based pricing model and a free-forever plan makes it highly accessible. For more details on their tests, see TestGorilla's assessments.
Use This If You Prefer X
Use this if you prefer a fast, self-service setup with a massive library of pre-made tests and a clear, predictable pricing structure.
Do Not Use This If You Prefer Y
Do not use this if you prefer a platform focused exclusively on deep, real-world engineering simulations that replicate a developer's actual work environment.
1 Standout Feature
The combination of a free plan and transparent, public pricing on paid tiers removes the barrier to entry for smaller teams.
Pricing
Publicly available. Offers a free plan for up to 5 assessments. Paid plans are credit-based, starting from $75/month (billed annually).
Does it evaluate candidates by watching how they work in real-life situations?
It offers coding challenges, but these are typically isolated problems rather than immersive, full-environment job simulations.
Best For
Small to mid-sized businesses (SMBs) and startups needing a versatile, easy-to-implement tool for a wide range of roles.
Main Downside
The credit-based model can become complex to manage at high hiring volumes, and it lacks the deep job simulation environments of specialized tools.
Does it show proof-of-work samples?
Yes, candidates' code submissions and test answers are viewable and serve as direct proof of their skills.
Does it have advanced proctoring or cheating mechanisms?
Yes, it includes features like webcam snapshots and full-screen mode detection to mitigate cheating.
Does it offer a free trial?
Yes, it offers a robust free-forever plan that allows teams to send up to five assessments.
Website: https://www.testgorilla.com/
6. Mercer | Mettl
Mercer | Mettl is a comprehensive online assessment platform serving corporate hiring, learning & development, and academic institutions. For engineering leaders, it provides a vast library of technical and coding assessments. The platform is designed for scale, with strong security protocols, making it a viable choice for organizations standardizing assessments globally.
Unlike hyper-specialized coding platforms, Mettl's core strength is its versatility. It offers an end-to-end solution that includes skill tests and behavioral evaluations, supported by robust AI-powered remote proctoring. This makes it a powerful tool for organizations that prioritize exam integrity for high-stakes roles or large-scale campus recruitment.
Main 3 Features
A large library of technical, cognitive, and behavioral tests.
Coding simulators and case study assessments.
Robust AI-powered remote proctoring.
Unique Differentiation aka Core USP
Its combination of a broad assessment portfolio with enterprise-grade, anti-cheating proctoring technology makes it ideal for secure, high-volume assessments.
Use This If You Prefer X
Use this if you prefer a highly secure, versatile platform that can handle everything from campus hiring to technical recruitment with a strong emphasis on proctoring.
Do Not Use This If You Prefer Y
Do not use this if you prefer a lightweight, developer-centric tool for quick, real-world coding challenges.
1 Standout Feature
Its AI-powered proctoring suite, which offers advanced features like facial recognition and browser monitoring to ensure high assessment integrity.
Pricing
Pricing is not public. It is customized and requires a consultation with their sales team.
Does it evaluate candidates by watching how they work in real-life situations?
Yes, it offers simulations for coding and system design, but they exist within a structured testing environment rather than a pure sandbox.
Best For
Large enterprises and educational institutions that require a secure, scalable, and multi-purpose assessment platform.
Main Downside
The extensive options can require significant configuration, and the lack of transparent pricing is a barrier for smaller teams.
Does it show proof-of-work samples?
Yes, code submissions, simulation results, and detailed performance reports serve as proof-of-work samples.
Does it have advanced proctoring or cheating mechanisms?
Yes, this is a core strength. It provides one of the industry's more advanced, AI-driven remote proctoring solutions.
Does it offer a free trial?
No, access is typically granted through a guided demo and a tailored trial.
Website: https://mettl.com/en-us/
7. HackerRank
HackerRank is one of the most recognized names in developer skills assessment. Its core strength lies in a vast library of coding challenges and a robust IDE that many developers are already familiar with. For engineering leaders, HackerRank provides a standardized method for evaluating algorithmic thinking and coding fundamentals.
Unlike platforms focused on holistic job simulations, HackerRank excels at top-of-funnel screening with a clear emphasis on technical skills. Its transparent pricing for entry-level tiers makes it accessible for teams to get started quickly. The platform is a go-to choice for companies looking to efficiently filter a high volume of candidates based on foundational knowledge in languages like Python basics.
Main 3 Features
A large library of coding and real-world project questions.
An AI-assisted coding IDE.
An integrated workflow for screening and live interviews.
Unique Differentiation aka Core USP
Its brand recognition and widespread adoption among developers create a familiar, low-friction experience for candidates.
Use This If You Prefer X
Use this if you prefer a trusted platform for automated, top-of-funnel screening focused on algorithmic and coding challenges with transparent initial pricing.
Do Not Use This If You Prefer Y
Do not use this if you prefer a tool to assess on-the-job problem-solving in a real-world environment or to evaluate skills beyond technical coding.
1 Standout Feature
Its combined Screen + Interview workflow allows teams to use a single platform for both initial automated assessments and subsequent live collaborative coding sessions.
Pricing
Public pricing is available for Starter and Pro tiers. Enterprise pricing is quote-based.
Does it evaluate candidates by watching how they work in real-life situations?
To some extent. It offers real-world project questions, but the primary focus remains on contained coding challenges rather than complex job tasks.
Best For
Organizations of all sizes that need an efficient, standardized tool to screen a high volume of candidates for core technical skills.
Main Downside
The per-attempt pricing model in lower tiers can become costly for high-volume hiring.
Does it show proof-of-work samples?
Yes, candidates' code submissions and test case results serve as direct proof-of-work.
Does it have advanced proctoring or cheating mechanisms?
Yes, higher-tier plans include AI-powered proctoring and plagiarism detection.
Does it offer a free trial?
Yes, it offers a 14-day free trial for its team-focused plans.
Website: https://www.hackerrank.com/
8. HireVue
HireVue is a comprehensive hiring platform that merges video interviewing with a suite of assessment tools. It aims to streamline high-volume recruiting by combining on-demand video interviews with game-based and coding assessments. For engineering leaders, HireVue offers a consolidated system to manage interviews and skills tests, particularly for large, globally distributed teams.
The platform’s core strength is its integration of video with skills assessment, allowing recruiters to see the candidate behind the code. HireVue’s enterprise-grade features, such as deep ATS integrations and a strong compliance posture, make it a viable choice for large organizations. Its model requires sales engagement for pricing, making it less accessible for smaller teams.
Main 3 Features
Integrated video interviewing (on-demand and live).
Game-based and mindset assessments.
Coding challenges and automated scheduling.
Unique Differentiation aka Core USP
The tight integration of video interviewing with a broad range of assessments creates a single platform for evaluating both hard and soft skills.
Use This If You Prefer X
Use this if you prefer a consolidated, enterprise-ready platform that combines video interviews and assessments to manage high-volume, distributed hiring.
Do Not Use This If You Prefer Y
Do not use this if you prefer a straightforward, developer-centric tool focused purely on immersive, real-world coding simulations.
1 Standout Feature
Its combination of on-demand video interviews with validated assessments allows asynchronous evaluation that scales effectively for large candidate pools.
Pricing
Pricing is not public and is customized. It requires engagement with their sales team.
Does it evaluate candidates by watching how they work in real-life situations?
Yes, it offers coding assessments, but its core strength is combining traditional challenges with video rather than hyper-realistic job simulations.
Best For
Large enterprises managing high-volume or global hiring that need a compliant, all-in-one system for interviews and assessments.
Main Downside
The lack of transparent pricing and a sales-led model create a barrier for quick adoption.
Does it show proof-of-work samples?
Yes, the platform provides reports from its coding and game-based assessments.
Does it have advanced proctoring or cheating mechanisms?
Yes, it includes features to ensure assessment integrity, a key requirement for its enterprise clients.
Does it offer a free trial?
No, a self-service free trial is not available. Access is provided through a guided demo.
9. Talogy (True Talent catalog)
Talogy operates as a comprehensive marketplace for psychometric and skills assessments. Instead of creating its own tests, it aggregates over 500 assessments from more than 50 well-known publishers like Pearson and SHL. For engineering leaders, this platform acts as a one-stop shop to browse, compare, and purchase a wide array of tools from a single interface.
The platform's strength is its breadth and accessibility. Users can search the catalog, view price ranges, and order assessments directly online. This self-serve model removes the friction of enterprise sales cycles. However, because Talogy aggregates content, the candidate experience can feel inconsistent across different tests.
Main 3 Features
A multi-publisher catalog with over 500 assessments.
Covers cognitive abilities, skills, and situational judgment tests.
E-commerce style ordering with volume discounts.
Unique Differentiation aka Core USP
Its "one-stop shop" model provides access to a massive library of assessments from dozens of industry-leading publishers through a single platform.
Use This If You Prefer X
Use this if you prefer a marketplace approach to mix and match assessments from various top-tier publishers without managing multiple contracts.
Do Not Use This If You Prefer Y
Do not use this if you prefer a unified and consistent candidate experience with a focus on deep, hands-on technical simulations.
1 Standout Feature
The self-service e-commerce functionality, which allows users to browse price ranges and purchase assessments directly online, simplifying procurement.
Pricing
Price ranges are visible in the catalog, but exact pricing may require creating an account. It offers volume-based discounts.
Does it evaluate candidates by watching how they work in real-life situations?
Yes, it offers simulations from various publishers, but these are aggregated and not developed in-house, leading to varied quality.
Best For
HR departments and large organizations that need a flexible assessment solution to cover diverse roles across the entire company.
Main Downside
The user and candidate experience can be disjointed as it varies significantly depending on the assessment publisher chosen.
Does it show proof-of-work samples?
Yes, the reports from the selected publisher’s assessments serve as proof of a candidate’s performance.
Does it have advanced proctoring or cheating mechanisms?
Varies by publisher. Proctoring solutions depend on the specific assessment selected from the catalog.
Does it offer a free trial?
No, the platform focuses on direct purchasing, though demos may be available for specific assessments.
Website: https://www.talogy.com/
How to pick the right skills assessment tool for your requirement, follow this simple decision making checklist
Selecting the right tool requires introspection about your team's specific needs and hiring philosophy. Your choice will shape not only who you hire but also your candidate experience and employer brand.
To make the right decision, follow this simple framework:
Define Your "Must-Haves": Are you hiring for senior roles requiring deep system design skills, or junior roles where foundational knowledge is key? Do you need to assess front-end, back-end, DevOps, or a mix? List your non-negotiable assessment capabilities.
Consider Your Scale and Budget: Your team size and hiring volume will dictate whether you need enterprise-level features like SSO and deep ATS integration or if a more agile, budget-friendly solution will suffice. Platforms like Utkrusht are tailored for smaller, dynamic engineering teams, while HireVue and SHL cater to large corporate structures.
Prioritize Candidate Experience: A clunky, irrelevant, or overly long assessment will deter top talent. The best skills assessment tools feel less like a test and more like a preview of the interesting challenges your company offers.
Run a Pilot Program: The most critical step is to test your top contenders. Sign up for free trials or demos. Have your own engineering team take the assessments. See which platform provides the most accurate and insightful signals. Always, always try a product for a month, then evaluate which is right for your needs.
Make skills—not guesswork—the core of your hiring process.
Utkrusht delivers realistic, role-specific assessments that reveal true talent fast. Get started now and transform your tech hiring pipeline.
Zubin leverages his engineering background and decade of B2B SaaS experience to drive GTM as the Co-founder of Utkrusht. He previously founded Zaminu, served 25+ B2B clients across US, Europe and India.
Want to hire
the best talent
with proof
of skill?
Shortlist candidates with
strong proof of skill
in just 48 hours
