We've seen 4 main reasons why customers chose us over others…

We've seen 4 main reasons why customers chose us over others…

  1. Our Assessments are actual Job Simulations.
    Our secret sauce…

  1. Our Assessments are actual Job Simulations.
    Our secret sauce…

  • Unlike other AI tools which simply ask coding tests or MCQ quizzes, our quick assessments replicate real job scenarios to ask candidates to perform your actual job tasks, (not just answer theory questions)


  • Our product evaluates candidates based on this method, and not by testing resume knowledge or doing AI-based video interview. Plus, you get candidates' video recording sessions, shortlist reports, etc.


  • This depth and correctness of their approach to solving tasks identifies the Top10 candidates within 100s of resumes you might have


  • We've back-tested this method across ~100 companies and with leaders at Oracle, Microsoft, Google, etc. to validate that gives quite possibly the strongest ideal candidate, fit for your requirements

Btw, check Anton Osika's (CEO, Lovable) response of this exact method when Harry Stebbings (20VC) asked

“what do you look for during candidate evaluations?”

Btw, check Anton Osika's (CEO, Lovable) response of this exact method when Harry Stebbings (20VC) asked

“what do you look for during candidate evaluations?”

  1. Quality and Depth of Questions
    from engineering leaders at Oracle, Microsoft, Google, etc.

  1. Quality and Depth of Questions
    from engineering leaders at Oracle, Microsoft, Google, etc.

  • We even thoroughly researched ~50 skill assessment tools out there, and one common complaint engineering leaders have is — the quality and depth of questions they ask is below average, and never really identifies someone's true technical skills


  • We also surveyed/interviewed engg leaders at several companies (including FAANG) to understand the depth needed in questions in their interviews


  • This further guarantees you're setting up yourself to get strong quality candidates in your team

  1. We're Engineering Leaders Ourselves
    not recruitment agencies

  1. We're Engineering Leaders Ourselves
    not recruitment agencies

  • Our platform is developed only after we've personally experienced tech hiring pain points ourselves, being a part of ~500 interviews


  • So it's not some random AI tool we built in 2 weeks, instead we've built a massive infrastructure to conduct assessments of actual job simulations, not AI-video interviews


  • We intentionally made this for tech hiring, typically engineering and developer based roles, and not hiring for all functions

  1. Built for Small Engineering Teams and Custom Software Development Companies
    typically companies <500 employees

  1. Built for Small Engineering Teams and Custom Software Development Companies
    typically companies <500 employees

  • Our assessments are built for small and mid-sized businesses (SMEs), custom software development companies, or growth-stage startups

  • Unlike some of the other players, we're not a big brand with huge funding and big resources, so if that's your main criteria you should not choose our product


  • But if your main criteria is — strongest evaluation of technical skills, never doing “guesswork” hiring, always have high degree of confidence (~95%) that the candidates you’ll interview will be the best fit for your position and requirements — then our product is right for you


  • We're a lean team who obsess daily, have done rigorous research and simulations in our models to get the exact hiring outcomes you want