See how deep and accurate a candidate's skills are, how they work with AI, on Tasks configured to your stack. Identity and proctored checks run on every session. Your engineers get their interview hours back, and roles fill in 7-10 days.
No credit card required | Quick 5 mins setup
Candidates assessed
Directly cuts down time-to-hire by
Technical skills covered
Candidate completion rate
Key outcomes
for tech and engineering teams
Evaluate technical skills in depth
Use it in any round, first screen or later. Candidates debug and fix a deployed system, and you see how they execute it, find the problem, and verify the fix.
Catch cheating, fake candidates, and profiles
Screen, prompts, and camera are fully recorded. Plus, identity checks, face liveness, and location signals flag anyone who isn't who they claim to be.
See HOW candidates actually use AI
How they engage with AI, prompt trail, output validation, prompt construction skills, guided AI, and much more.
Customize Tasks for your role & scenarios
Upload JDs or your own problem and get a Task built around it. Candidates are evaluated on the work they would do on your team.
Solve your top challenges with technical assessments
Technical interviews and live coding challenges
Utkrusht solutions
30-45-min interview rounds to learn candidates can't write a simple function
Candidates complete a Task first. You see the best 5-10 shortlist. Then decide and move forward
Coding pads check whether someone can write and compile a function under pressure
Candidates work in a deployed codebase with their own editor and AI tools, as they would on the job
Easier to cheat than ever. Cheating tools are everywhere. Catching it only tells you who to disqualify
Strong anti-proctoring feature set. Plus, candidates debug and fix a running system with AI allowed. The recording and prompt trail show who did the thinking
The browser IDE is nothing like the editor and tools developers use daily
Candidates use their own laptop, IDE and AI agents, connected to a live environment. Exactly like they will when on the job
3 to 5 rounds per candidate, huge time and effort spent by the interview panel, and calendars rarely line up
Tasks run without an interviewer, at any hour, and then reviewed in minutes
Features that
make Utkrusht different than others
Evaluation method
Live production environments
Watch each candidate fix real servers, clusters and databases, with no interviewer in the room.
Your interviewer's valuable time is saved to only talk to high-calibre candidates already shown proof-of-skill.
In-depth candidate reports
Candidate attempt analysis reports
Review a 45-minute attempt in minutes, with every evidence linked to the moment in the video.
Deepfakes and anti-cheating
Proctoring and identity signals
Confirm the person who took the Task is the same person who joins, with features like VPN and proxy detection, face liveness, selfie verification, etc.
Easily catch candidates who attempt cheating when taking Tasks with sharp proctoring features already built-in.
Non-leakable Tasks
Tasks built-in for 350+ skills and new Tasks generated every week
Hire for all your software engineering and developer roles (even seniors) at once without building or resetting a single task.
Also included niche roles like embedded, cybersecurity, and much more.
FAQs
Does this replace our interview rounds?
We've seen companies replacing the first HR-screening round, coding round, and for many teams the system design round. Keep one or two human rounds after it, since we recommend having some human interaction is a must in the hiring process.
Can it be used for system design interviews?
Yes. Candidates redesign a given architecture against stated targets and submit a diagram and design document. An interviewer can review it afterwards.
If candidates can use AI, how do you know who is good?
Two candidates with the same AI tool reach very different results. The report scores HOW they used AI, how specific their prompts were, whether they checked the AI's output, and whether they verified the fix.
Cheating and fake candidates are rampant today. How is that handled?
We have built strong feature set that tackles each of these, like strict proctored sessions, proxy and VPN detection, face liveness and selfie verification run on every session, and new Tasks are added every week.
Will senior candidates agree to it?
We've seen our Tasks engagement is strongest for candidates with roughly 3 to 8 years of experience. Since ours are byte-sized 30-45 min Tasks and not lenghty coding tests or 24-48hour take-homes, candidates LOVE taking it.
Still got questions?
Just book a call directly with our team
