Understanding our Assessments

We have 2 types of Assessments — Tests and Tasks

We have 2 types of Assessments — Tests and Tasks

Our Assessments are rigorously tested, to identify true technical and fundamental skills of candidates, helping you accurately predict their job performance.

Our Assessments are rigorously tested, to identify true technical and fundamental skills of candidates, helping you accurately predict their job performance.

What is a Test?

1 test is a series of 10 QnA real scenario-based, questions asked to candidates.

Unlike Mcq-type quizzes or pointless back-and-forth questions, our questions are open-ended, measuring good judgement, taste, decision-making under constraints, etc.

Tests are more quick scenario-based questions you'd ask on a phone screening call, well-suited for volume filtering by doing quick fundamentals' check.


What is a Task?

1 task is an actual on-the-job task where candidates code, design, and solve a real on-the-job problem, and deploy it in a live production environment.

Tasks are designed to allow you watch candidates how they debug, make tradeoffs, build features, fix APIs, etc.


Tasks are more detailed pair-programming style on-the-job task, well-suited to measure in-depth fundamental skills, use of AI, and problem-solving approach, making them actually build something live in-action.


"Should I buy Tests or Tasks for my candidate Screening and Shortlisting process?"


This largely depends on your factors like — role, skill level, your personal preference, level of depth you want to assess, etc.

From what we've seen, Tasks are better than Tests due to its very nature to accurately assess a candidate's technical depth, fundamental skills, foundational concepts, etc.

But then, we've had customers who only want to ensure candidates know high-level fundamentals and want to quickly filter out weak candidates, in which case Tests (open-ended real on-the-job scenario questions) does the job.

You decide. You control.


"How are candidates evaluated? Does Tasks evaluate candidates better than Tests?"


Our product does standardized, objective scoring across parameters like — technical execution, AI use, communication, and judgment that lets teams compare candidates quickly and fairly.

If you think about it, tasks does evaluate a candidate better than a test, because it makes a candidate actually build something live in action, and you see how they performed on that.

Ready to hire your next candidate with proof of skill?