Finding AI Engineers in 14 days, not months
DPDZero is a fast-growing startup building next-generation solutions in a competitive market where speed and technical excellence aren't optional—they're survival.
DPDZero x Utkrusht: Key Takeaways
Sector
Technology Startup
Requirement
Hiring specialized AI/DevOps engineer with proven technical depth
Outcome
DPDZero filled a critical DevOps Engineer role in 14 days—down from 3 months—and finally hired someone who could actually do the job.
What They Were Doing Before
Before Utkrusht, DPDZero was stuck in the traditional hiring grind that every startup knows too well:
Traditional Recruiters: Working with recruitment agencies who'd blast job descriptions across platforms, then sent a flood of generic candidates.
Personal Networks: Reaching out to their own networks, posting in Slack communities, asking for referrals from friends. This worked for the first few hires, but dried up quickly when they needed specialized skills.
Job Boards & LinkedIn: Posting roles and praying. The applications came in, but 95% were completely unqualified. The other 5% looked promising until the technical interview revealed they couldn't actually do the work.
The process was:
Post the role everywhere
Screen 100+ resumes
Phone screen 20-30 candidates
Technical interview 10-15 per week
Watch them fail basic technical questions
Repeat for 2-3 months
Eventually settle for "good enough" or start over
It wasn't working. It was just... the only option they knew.
The Challenges & Pain Points
DPDZero's hiring came down to 2 key problems:
1. Specialized Skills Are Impossible to Assess from Resumes
When you're hiring for AI engineers, DevOps engineers, and Data engineers, resumes lie. Someone can list "Kubernetes, Docker, Terraform, CI/CD" on their CV, but that tells you nothing about whether they can actually architect a scalable deployment pipeline or debug a failing cluster at 2 AM.
2. Interviewing Unqualified Candidates Destroyed Team Productivity
The technical team was spending 10-15 hours per week interviewing candidates, that's time not spent shipping product, fixing bugs, or scaling infrastructure.
How Utkrusht Helped
DPDZero's entire hiring approach shifted when they used Utkrusht’s skill assessment platform. Instead of screening hundreds of candidates hoping to find one good one, they got a pre-vetted shortlist of people who'd already proven their technical abilities.
The Utkrusht Difference:
1. Pre-Vetted Candidate Database
Every candidate in Utkrusht's network has completed comprehensive, role-specific assessments before being recommended to any company. This isn't a "take our word for it" situation—there's objective data showing what each candidate can actually do.
For DPDZero, this meant no more gambling. When Utkrusht sent over 3 DevOps candidates, all 3 had already demonstrated their technical depth through rigorous assessments.
2. Real Technical Validation, Not Resume Screening
Utkrusht's assessments don't test trivia. They don't ask "What's the difference between TCP and UDP?" They evaluate how candidates think, problem-solve, and execute under real-world conditions.
3. Specialized for Hard-to-Fill Roles
Most assessment platforms are built for generic "software engineer" roles. Utkrusht's assessments are also designed specifically for niche roles that actually matter to startups and SMEs building technical products: DevOps, AI engineering, Data engineering, Backend engineering.
The questions aren't generic. The scenarios aren't basic. The bar is high—because that's what DPDZero needed.
"We were interviewing 10-15 people every single week, and almost none of them could actually pass our technical rounds. It wasn't a pipeline problem—it was a quality problem. We needed people who'd already proven they could do this work, not just people who said they could."
— Ranjith, Founder/CTO, DPDZero
The Results
The transformation wasn't just about speed—though going from 2-3 months to 14 days is pretty damn good. It was about finally being able to hire people who could actually do the job.
Time to Hire: 14 Days (vs. 2-3 Months)
Day 1-2: Received 3 pre-vetted candidates who took the assessments on the platform
Day 3-12: Conducted interviews with their team
Day 14: Offer accepted
That's 85% faster than their previous timeline. Every week saved is a week of productive work instead of desperate searching.
Candidate Quality: 3 Strong Candidates (vs. 60+ Weak Ones)
Before Utkrusht, DPDZero was interviewing 10-15 candidates per week, most of whom couldn't pass basic technical questions. That's 60+ interviews per month, with maybe 1-2 decent candidates mixed in.
With Utkrusht, they interviewed 3 candidates total—and all 3 were technically qualified. That's a 95% reduction in wasted interview time.
Hire Quality: Someone Who Actually Delivers
The candidate has been performing well for months. No post-hire regret. No "we thought he could do it, but..." conversations. He showed up, did the work, and proved the assessments weren't lying.
That's the real ROI: confidence that your hire will work out.
Cost Savings: Hard to Quantify, Impossible to Ignore
Let's do some startup math:
2 months of an empty DevOps role = 2 months of infrastructure debt, scaling issues, and engineer burnout
60+ wasted interviews = ~80 hours of senior engineering time @ $100+/hour = $8,000+ in opportunity cost
1 bad hire = 3-6 months of reduced productivity + restarting the search = $20,000+ in total cost
Utkrusht didn't just save time. They saved DPDZero from the compounding cost of bad hiring decisions.
What Stood Out Most
When we asked DPDZero what made the biggest difference, they didn't talk about speed (though 14 days vs. 2-3 months is pretty compelling). They didn't even talk about cost savings.
They talked about the philosophy. The method to assess candidates is 10x better than all the tools out there who simply conduct MCQ quizzes and test theory knowledge..
Assessment-First Hiring Changes Everything
Most hiring is backwards. You screen resumes, do phone calls, bring people in for interviews, and then—if you're lucky—you find out in the technical round whether they can actually do the work.
By that point, you've invested hours. You've gotten excited about a candidate. You're hoping they'll pass because you don't want to start over.
Utkrusht flips the script: prove you can do the work first, then we'll talk.
Why This Matters for Specialized Roles
When you're hiring for generic roles—customer support, sales, operations—you can get away with resume-first hiring. The skills are transferable. The learning curve is manageable. A bad hire is fixable.
But when you're hiring for AI engineers, DevOps engineers, and Data engineers, you can't afford to guess. These roles are:
Too specialized: The skills aren't common. You can't just "train someone up."
Too new: AI engineering barely existed 3 years ago. Everyone's resume is a fiction.
Too critical: A bad DevOps hire means infrastructure fires. A bad AI hire means your ML systems don't work.
For these roles, assessment-first hiring isn't a nice-to-have—it's the only thing that actually works.
DPDZero finally understood that, and it changed how they think about hiring forever.
Why DPDZero Chose Utkrusht Over Others
DPDZero had options. They could've kept using traditional recruiters. They could've tried other assessment platforms. They could've built their own technical tests.
So why Utkrusht?
1. Built for Specialized Technical Roles
Most platforms are designed for "software engineer" hiring at scale—think Big Tech screening thousands of candidates for generic roles.
Utkrusht is built for startups and SMEs hiring specialized, hard-to-fill technical roles. The assessments aren't generic LeetCode problems. They're designed specifically for DevOps, AI engineering, Data engineering, and other roles where depth matters more than breadth.
DPDZero needed someone who understood the difference between a full-stack developer and a DevOps engineer. Utkrusht got it immediately.
2. Pre-Vetted Database, Not DIY Assessments
Some platforms give you tools to build your own assessments. Great—if you have time to design tests, validate questions, and score candidates yourself.
DPDZero didn't have that time. They needed candidates now, and they needed confidence those candidates were good.
Utkrusht's pre-vetted database meant the hard work was already done. Candidates had taken assessments, been scored, and been validated before DPDZero even heard their names.
3. The Philosophy Aligned
This was the clincher. When DPDZero talked to Utkrusht, they didn't hear a sales pitch about "AI-powered matching" or "our algorithm is 10x better."
They heard a philosophy: Skills matter more than resumes. Proof matters more than promises. Assessment-first hiring is the only way to actually know if someone can do the job.
That resonated. DPDZero had been burned too many times by candidates who looked great on paper but couldn't deliver. They were tired of guessing. They wanted data.
Utkrusht gave them that.
4. They Understood the Pain
Most recruiters don't understand how hard it is to hire AI engineers or DevOps engineers. They treat them like any other "tech role" and send over generic candidates who happen to have the right keywords on their resume.
Utkrusht understood why these roles are different. Why AI engineering is too new for traditional experience requirements to mean anything. Why DevOps is too intricate to assess from a 45-minute interview. Why Data engineering sits at this weird intersection of skills that most candidates don't actually have.
When DPDZero explained their problem, Utkrusht didn't just nod along—they got it. That level of understanding made all the difference.
"The difference was night and day. We weren't gambling on whether someone could actually do the work anymore. The assessments had already answered that question. We just needed to make sure they'd fit with the team—and they did."
— Ranjith, Founder/CTO, DPDZero
What's Next
DPDZero isn't going back to the old way. They've seen what assessment-first hiring can do.
When they need to fill their next AI engineer role, they're not posting on LinkedIn and hoping for the best or spending 2 months interviewing 60 people who can't pass a basic technical round.
For roles where technical depth is non-negotiable, skills-first hiring isn't just faster—it's the only approach that actually works.
"We finally found someone who could actually do the job. Not someone who interviewed well. Not someone with an impressive resume. Someone who'd proven they could execute—and then he did exactly that. That's what we'd been missing for months."
— Ranjith, Founder/CTO, DPDZero
Frequently Asked Questions
Want to hire
the best talent
with proof
of skill?
Shortlist candidates with
strong proof of skill
in just 48 hours
